An Anarchist FAQ, Volume 1
Friday, January 16th, 2009
When it comes to political theory, anarchism is really the closest thing I can associate my ideas with. As with so many things I gravitate towards, this is just another label that tends to lend itself to cliques and elitist attitudes in the most unfortunate of ways. Most recently this became ever so prevalent in reading the latest offering from Oakland’s AK Press.
An Anarchist FAQ (AFAQ), Volume 1 edited by Iain McKay would seem more aptly titled A Selection of Anarchist Quotes. While this is something McKay addressed in the introduction, it is almost amusing to flip through the book and look for the bold type referencing the title of a quoted book. I also appreciate Iain’s understanding that with anrachism being what it is at a base level - individual freedom, many will not agree with the way he (and an apparent collective) have defined the word or its adherents. However, in acknowledging this fact, it seems an impossibilty to nail down such a definition. In doing so, I feel AFAQ reads more in a “my way or the highway” style rather than allowing the true freedom anarchist theory would generally suggest. A rather ludicris section in the book (A.1.3) goes about quoting the American Heritage Dictionary on the words Libertarian and Socialism, afterwards stating that “Those wanting to debate dictionary definitions are free to persue this unending and politically useless hobby but we will not.” All while this is the essence of AFAQ, to determine or answer what is and is not anarchy!
In all it’s bound splendor, AFAQ is over 500 pages of terrefic anarchist quotes linked together by McKay’s incessant rights and wrongs of anarchism as according to himself and a short list of contributors. I love it for a lot of the quotes and hate it for what seems to be an absolute want for recognition as well as the overbearing need to discredit the anarcho-capitalist theory on McKay’s end.
Again, with anarchism being the freedom angled theory it is, I felt AFAQ reads in too many absolutes. This is really too bad considering the size and obvious effort that has gone into the project. Being a book McKay stated he would hope turns others on to anarchy, I am surprised this is the final outcome.
Find out more as well as find some great reading at AK Press






